The flaw at the heart of Liberalsim us its implausibly abstract theory of the self, the pure autonomous chooser.
Liberalsim ultimately assumes that it makes sense to identify us with a pure capacity for choice,
Yet such pure choosers might reject any or all of their attachments and values and yet retain their identity
So how could that be? You have a supposedly free liberated person who has exercised their humand right to
choos, so the choosed to reject all values and attachments, yet in doing do they are left with no identity
illustrating the feet of clay at the heart of the liberal argument,
Liberalsim ultimately assumes that it makes sense to identify us with a pure capacity for choice,
Yet such pure choosers might reject any or all of their attachments and values and yet retain their identity
So how could that be? You have a supposedly free liberated person who has exercised their humand right to
choos, so the choosed to reject all values and attachments, yet in doing do they are left with no identity
illustrating the feet of clay at the heart of the liberal argument,
No comments:
Post a Comment