A Tale of two pooches who refused to stay on the porch

'He (Trump) is a serial philanderer who treats women as disposable conquests. He is a man who...also sexually assaults women. And he is a man who lies about it all.'  Says the NYT journalist. Could that not be said about Clinton, that other President pooch who refused to stay on the porch

By omitting such a  comparison, not only illustrates your selective amnesia but also demonstrate a one dimensional bias?  You resurrect the Stormy Daniels interview  without a comment of the quite nauseating salacious nature of it; talk about the swamp!  'Did he use protection?' inquired  the 'journalist', with his faux gravitas, a question that would cause, in such circumstances, any civilized person to reach for the sick bag, you reference the interview as if it was a sacred discussion on some Papal edict

'Somehow, some folks, mostly conservative ones, have found a way to conveniently look away'; but you too have found a way to look away through the stealth of your pen.  Now who was it that said 'journalism' can be an organized violence committed on ordinary speech because  it constitutes a deviation from average speech that estranges the reader; who was it? It was me.

'Courage should still matter in America. We must insist upon it' you trumpet as if atop Mount Parnassus. Well, why don't you apply that dictum to yourself? say by a  compare and contrast approach of the two Presidential pooches who doggedly refused to stay on their porch.