Sam Beckett's writing is not about 'something' what then is it about?
Which brings me to tennis, Beckett was fascinated by tennis, as am I, pauvre moi, so much so that I have oft
wondered about the
etymology of the word 'tennis', which bring me to....
love love love thud of the old plunger
pestling the unalterable
whey of words
Which brings me to tennis, Beckett was fascinated by tennis, as am I, pauvre moi, so much so that I have oft
wondered about the
etymology of the word 'tennis', which bring me to....
The Swiss tennis
champion Stan Wawrinka has the words “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try
again. Fail again. Fail better” tattooed in blue ink on the inside of his left
forearm.
Which bring me to....the lachrymose ending of Israel Horovitz’s recent movie My Old Lady has Kevin Kline paying his respects at a tombstone on which are engraved the words “If you do not love me I shall not be loved.” The first of these quotations is from Samuel Beckett’s late prose piece Worstward Ho, the second from his 1936 poem “Cascando
Which bring me to....the lachrymose ending of Israel Horovitz’s recent movie My Old Lady has Kevin Kline paying his respects at a tombstone on which are engraved the words “If you do not love me I shall not be loved.” The first of these quotations is from Samuel Beckett’s late prose piece Worstward Ho, the second from his 1936 poem “Cascando
is this Beckettian verbal nausea or lapidary cadence?
the churn of stale
words in the heart againlove love love thud of the old plunger
pestling the unalterable
whey of words
Years after the utterly
unexpected success of Waiting for Godot in the mid-1950s, which brought him
money and fame. Success was not what Beckett had bargained for: his compact
with the Muses stipulated that he must embrace, as his biographer James
Knowlson summarizes, “poverty, failure, exile, and loss.” Instead of failing
better, he was now succeeding worse. Damn it.
More content in his Sisyphus role, he wrote ‘...
the only chance for me now as a writer is to go into retreat and put a stop to all this fucking élan acquis [momentum] and get back down to the bottom.’
There is a magnificent, ten-word summation of how he writes in
a letter of 1959 to Nancy Cunard: “Holes in paper open and take me fathoms from
anywhere.'
Thus life in failure can hardly be anything but dismal at the best, whereas there is nothing more exciting for the writer, or richer in unexploited expressive possibilities, than the failure to express.
One has to say that the familiar Beckett themes: isolation, absence of hope, approach of death are well so...Irish.
More content in his Sisyphus role, he wrote ‘...
the only chance for me now as a writer is to go into retreat and put a stop to all this fucking élan acquis [momentum] and get back down to the bottom.’
'I huddled, in the
innermost place of human frailty and lowliness. To fly there for me was not to
fly far, and I’m not saying this is right for you.' You can say that again, Sam.
With Beckett memory is mocked. Beckett’s characters do not remember. Memory is
mocked—Molloy can’t remember his own name or his mother’s; Estragon can’t
remember in the second act of Godot what happened the previous day in
the first act and he and Vladimir can’t remember whether they lived in the
Mâcon country or the Cackon country. A typical exchange in Endgame is:
Hamm: What have you
done with your bicycle?
Clov: I never had a bicycle
What then should be the
role of the writer, he should know his place of trying and failing “to find the
rhythm and syntax of extreme weakness, penury perhaps I should say.”
Thus life in failure can hardly be anything but dismal at the best, whereas there is nothing more exciting for the writer, or richer in unexploited expressive possibilities, than the failure to express.
Beckett writes '...to Dublin for a week at
least at the beginning of December to see an old friend who is very ill, the
usual Irish errand.” “I feel as clucky and beady about this piece, ...it is pleasantly sad
and sentimental: a nice little entrée of artichoke hearts, to be followed by
the tripe à la shit of Hamm and Clov. People will say, Well, well, he has blood
in his veins, who would have thought it, it must be age.
Beckett's niggle about words, why should he search for the wrong word when he is adept at choosing the right word? Is it him just being meticulous or is that Beckett is drawn to enigmas, or to anything that strives to elude description. And the real does defy description. He may give a soupcon, a hint of meaning
without disclosing what it is.
Beckett's niggle about words, why should he search for the wrong word when he is adept at choosing the right word? Is it him just being meticulous or is that Beckett is drawn to enigmas, or to anything that strives to elude description. And the real does defy description. He may give a soupcon, a hint of meaning
without disclosing what it is.
Beckett may be of the view that some of us at least want the counter-truth – on occasion we want oblivion, extinction, irreversible loss of consciousness.
Some of these requirements are insufficiently, or mostly prophylactically, rendered by literature.
Some of these requirements are insufficiently, or mostly prophylactically, rendered by literature.
Beckett ascribed to Proust: ‘By his impressionism I mean his
non-logical statement of phenomena in the order and exactitude of their
perception, before they have been distorted into intelligibility in order to be
forced into a chain of cause and effect.' Did you get that?
Can this be a negotiation between the narcissistic pleasures of unbridled
fantasy and the particular thirst for communication which can be qualified as
‘love of the brethren’
This counter-truth – that, on occasion and more than moodily, we
want oblivion, extinction, irreversible loss of consciousness,
One has to say that the familiar Beckett themes: isolation, absence of hope, approach of death are well so...Irish.
No comments:
Post a Comment