Progressive argumentation for one. Not obfuscation, nor a complete reliance on reason, but that reason itself is put to the rack. Not sentences with long-haul subordinate clauses, nor the other extreme of the delphically abrevatied. I admire those who reject certitude. I enjoy a kind of communication that is allergic to slack and what in conceptual terms has become rigidified
and obsolete,
But what is the end aim? Well you are ascending the mountain and so am I and we are on different faces of this mountain. it is not a race to get to the peak and plant our flag, for we realise we are arguing around a monad, that indivisible, impenetrable unit of substance viewed as the basic constituent element of physical reality,
For we are engaging in process, praxis, a kind of reflection and action upon the world in order to transform it. If we are seeking the 'truth' (that commercially valuable whiter that white washing powder concept) we may look for the truth in what does not fit in.
and obsolete,
But what is the end aim? Well you are ascending the mountain and so am I and we are on different faces of this mountain. it is not a race to get to the peak and plant our flag, for we realise we are arguing around a monad, that indivisible, impenetrable unit of substance viewed as the basic constituent element of physical reality,
For we are engaging in process, praxis, a kind of reflection and action upon the world in order to transform it. If we are seeking the 'truth' (that commercially valuable whiter that white washing powder concept) we may look for the truth in what does not fit in.
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE send comments to
cheeverspeter@hotmail,com