The epistemic injustice of not believing someones story

 There is a growing literature about how failing to give a testifier the credit they deserve gives rise to a form of epistemic injustice (e.g., M. Fricker 2007).[1] 

Moreover, there are many interesting questions about eyewitness testimony and the law (e.g., Wells & Olson 2003 and Burroughs & Tollefsen 2016), as well as important questions about the relationship between testimony and assertion (e.g., Pagin 2007 [2016]). And there are also growing literatures about moral testimony[2] and aesthetic testimony

testimonial justification can be reduced to a combination of perceptual, memorial, and inferential justification.