The re-education of Pelosi, Harris and Booker

All 'moral' claims are inherently prejudicial; one can't make a substantive claim for the 'good'
because this claim strays into meta psychics and  one cannot have  a substantive argument once there.

Moral claims are transitory, because we are subject to the transitory influences  all the time
ie, allegory was the dialectic in the 17th century, it morphed into novel which morphed  into commodity which in the 20th Century which morphed into Image and technological age

We are subjected to zeitgeists, and socio, politico economical influences all the time and these vary through the years, as a result it is the transitory that is permanent, and not this selling the moral as a universal and permanent
'good'.