To encapsulate an article in the New York Times in which the journalist demonstrates is his own animus of Donald Trump. Under the guise of civilised
discourse we get a form of sanitised virulence all packaged for readers under the flagship of a 'serious' paper.
But what is Mr Blow's distaste? is it cultural, spiritual, moral? a holy trinity which can be quite easily deconstructed as a self serving coalition, a triumvirate without substance, but loud hailer as he may and cathartic it might be, however the only real comfort can be metaphysical and that is a sort of comfort that defies reason.
discourse we get a form of sanitised virulence all packaged for readers under the flagship of a 'serious' paper.
But what is Mr Blow's distaste? is it cultural, spiritual, moral? a holy trinity which can be quite easily deconstructed as a self serving coalition, a triumvirate without substance, but loud hailer as he may and cathartic it might be, however the only real comfort can be metaphysical and that is a sort of comfort that defies reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment