'We have shown that the
administration of justice can be fair, can be effective, can be nonpartisan and
neutral.' There is no such human state as neutral. Our car goes into neutral
but it is not neutral it is actively idling.
A neutral zone would
leave the Law sitting on the fenceThe article quotes: ’They changed the rules for F.B.I.
investigations'; well, hasn’t that stood the test of time?
'“What’s not O.K. is for the White House, and
especially the President, to have any involvement with criminal prosecutions.
That really turns the rule of law on its head.” Yet conversely it is
perfectly acceptable for legal minds, factually Trump haters, at vast taxpayers expense to pathologically
pursue Trump associate with the knock on the door in the dead of night tactic;
now what does that remind you of? Kafka
or Hitler?
‘They allowed
uncomfortable investigations to proceed unimpeded.’ But Trump has been subject to 2 years
of bogus investigation, like being infected by a virus.
‘As to a baseless new
inquiry into Clinton’ so you have
already decided that it is baseless, without due process, (I think that is the
legal term. no lawyer me, thank God). A
neutral state it is an asinine claim, there is no hill outside language where
we can stand on and silently observe it in our neutral state, for even though
we are silent (supposedly neutral) we are still thinking in language, indeed
the argument goes that language is fascistic.
If one
wanted to get all Wittgensteinian ‘ It ain’t what you say, it’s the way that
you say it’ and the context in which you say it. I should be lecturing at Journalism school,
(Joke) Well, at least I am not neutral.
No comments:
Post a Comment