One can only describe this piece (article in the New York Times on Donald Trump's 'manliness;) as quite extraordinarily one sided; by this account the man (Trump) has not one redeeming feature.
On reading it it appears to be bias concreted up with hearsay. Don't men just love to gossip yes, all those 'men' indulging in tittle tattle, sneering and giggling from the safety of the sidelines.
I am afraid there is no reaching for depth in this epistemologically flawed pieceby depth I am referring to male identity, what are males striving for? Identity, but identity to what?
To all those talkative 'men' a lot of whom have been thoroughly emasculated by soi disant 'education' one wonders have they ever done a manly day's labour...you know hoeing in the fields.
Anyway, permit me to lapse into the poetics and address these talkative men; you are as constructed as me; the same anarchic Womb has birthed us both. I call upon you to investigate your nature and I don't mean your tendency to smugly sneer at lesser mortals from atop Mount Moral. How about you risking abjection by being the target rather than the sniper. PS Currently the odds in the UK of you accepting this comment are 500 to 1 against. Toodle pip.
I was wrong, mea culpa, they printed it.
No comments:
Post a Comment