Despite the earth rotating and hurtling through space

HUGO: Nothing in your world is denied it‟s just that, in addition, your world is

entangled in other worlds that we do not understand. This is a fact which you have to

place alongside....alongside...the claimed fact that this is a chair and my feet are

firmly on the ground. Despite the earth rotating and hurtling through space. Our world

is in fact many worlds and what you and I see are illusions or delusions which we

reify into reality. But reality is elsewhere getting on with it without any input from us.

Look we are perceivers. We are an awareness; we are not objects; we have no

solidity. The world of objects and solidity is a way of making our passage on earth

convenient. It is only a description and I would call it a deception that was created to

help us. We, or rather our reason, forget that the description is only a description and

thus we entrap the totality of ourselves in a vicious circle from which we rarely

emerge in our lifetime. I‟m quoting Castaneda, there.

HUGO: So the populace tune into that pornographic media babble. For we hope to be told

that beneath all this there is still concealed a true universe. One safe place where we exist. So

we sit, watch, listen and wait for the news. But if you want to be part of the drive that opens

a few logic gates…beyond convention and routine not going to do it by listening to the

„experts‟. Instead of analysing soaps at University, why don‟t kids do „expert‟ studies?

Analyse the knowingness of the „experts‟ that are trotted out by the media.

HUGO: So the populace tune into that pornographic media babble. For we hope to be told

that beneath all this there is still concealed a true universe. One safe place where we exist. So

we sit, watch, listen and wait for the news. But if you want to be part of the drive that opens

a few logic gates…beyond convention and routine not going to do it by listening to the

„experts‟. Instead of analysing soaps at University, why don‟t kids do „expert‟ studies?

Analyse the knowingness of the „experts‟ that are trotted out by the media.