US Senators, Falwell and Schiff repeatedly asserted that Trump's guilt was 'in plain sight', like a pair of Horatio Hornblowers' using naval metaphors, this dystopian take on reality was issued with such certainty as if Trump's guilt was pellucidly clear.
Of course it was a sickening kind of bravado; has there been an apology from them, will they retract? of course they wont, although their claims were an initiatory encroachment on the rule of Law itself 'innocent until proven guilty' but whether they do or not retract, their cheeks are forever stained with shame.
What we have with 'Senatorial' duo is a rhetorical impaction
Trump is guility'
'it is clear, in plain sight,' repeat it often enough and it becomes
a thematically evacuated abstraction of soi disant (so called) knowledge
'the evidence is in plain sight' a theoretically jejune (adolescent) empiricism of taxonomy(naming defining) effects.
—
Of course it was a sickening kind of bravado; has there been an apology from them, will they retract? of course they wont, although their claims were an initiatory encroachment on the rule of Law itself 'innocent until proven guilty' but whether they do or not retract, their cheeks are forever stained with shame.
What we have with 'Senatorial' duo is a rhetorical impaction
Trump is guility'
'it is clear, in plain sight,' repeat it often enough and it becomes
a thematically evacuated abstraction of soi disant (so called) knowledge
'the evidence is in plain sight' a theoretically jejune (adolescent) empiricism of taxonomy(naming defining) effects.
What we get from these two 'Senators' is the cognition of a diagnosable pathology.
—
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE send comments to
cheeverspeter@hotmail,com