A comment by your blogger on New York Times article (I am surprised they published it)
So tell me what 'moral clarity; would you have offered, why don't you give an example of how you would have put it. Your use of the term 'moral clarity' demonstrates how myopic your thinking is. The word 'moral' is a catch all term to brow beat those who differ in their views.
For God sake wake up, 'morality' does not inhere is us humans as does the sting in a bee; culture appropriates us into employing such a word and it is employed mindlessly as a form of name calling
'It took the importuning of his Jewish daughter and son-in-law...' How do you 'know' this where is the evidence to corroborate this?
Yet his castigation of “globalists,” seen by some as code for Jews, (now who are the 'some'?) 'and his attacks on George Soros; ' but why shouldn't Mr Soros be criticized? Others have done so, '...the 'arch villian' who broke the Bank of England: Daily Telegraph.co.uk 13 Sep 2002 and Daily Mail 8 Feb 2018.'George Soros, in a rare moment of candour, once confessed to being driven by what armchair psychiatrists would call a Messiah complex.'
It is too wearisome to trawl through the article it really is like marking the paper of a poor student who employs hear say as opposed to evidence or context. I am going to be very rude here, I do believe that the journalists on the NYT are 'uneducated, that is not to say they have not gone through a process of soi disant (so called) education, but the tentacles of culture more often than not overpowers, then asphyxiates education.
So tell me what 'moral clarity; would you have offered, why don't you give an example of how you would have put it. Your use of the term 'moral clarity' demonstrates how myopic your thinking is. The word 'moral' is a catch all term to brow beat those who differ in their views.
For God sake wake up, 'morality' does not inhere is us humans as does the sting in a bee; culture appropriates us into employing such a word and it is employed mindlessly as a form of name calling
'It took the importuning of his Jewish daughter and son-in-law...' How do you 'know' this where is the evidence to corroborate this?
Yet his castigation of “globalists,” seen by some as code for Jews, (now who are the 'some'?) 'and his attacks on George Soros; ' but why shouldn't Mr Soros be criticized? Others have done so, '...the 'arch villian' who broke the Bank of England: Daily Telegraph.co.uk 13 Sep 2002 and Daily Mail 8 Feb 2018.'George Soros, in a rare moment of candour, once confessed to being driven by what armchair psychiatrists would call a Messiah complex.'
It is too wearisome to trawl through the article it really is like marking the paper of a poor student who employs hear say as opposed to evidence or context. I am going to be very rude here, I do believe that the journalists on the NYT are 'uneducated, that is not to say they have not gone through a process of soi disant (so called) education, but the tentacles of culture more often than not overpowers, then asphyxiates education.
No comments:
Post a Comment