The problem with poliical correctness.
Ethical relativism (a term Žižek doesn’t use, but which
concisely encapsulates a number of his targets) refers to several
related concepts: the idea that all truth claims are contingent -
social constructions valid only for members of particular cultures;
Are all truth claims contingent?
The rejection of universal truth claims on the ground that asserting
a universal truth entails denying, and thus disrespecting, the
validity of another’s culture and identity; for fear of offending others or of appearing
politically incorrect. Quickly,
Žižek’s arguments against these
notions are as follows: First, it makes no sense to speak of a
relative truth that doesn’t apply universally. For a claim to be
considered true, it must, by definition, be presumed to be
universally valid for everyone.
If others reject the validity of a
claim that I believe to be true, that’s because they are mistaken,
not because they hold a different subject position or come from a
different culture. Second, talk of respecting difference or otherness
fetishizes empty abstractions and is effectively meaningless, mere
grandstanding rhetoric. In practice, respecting another’s belief or
practice requires us to take it seriously enough to judge whether it
is true or false, right or wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment