Since 'metaphysics' which is understood as a speculative branch of knowledge and pursuit of the trans empirical realities is neither 'philosophy-proper' nor one of the natural sciences which only purports to legitimate function of the descriptions of facts of reality.
On this count, metaphysics has been shown to be 'impossible' and its statements being 'meaningless and pseudo' resulting from a violation of the logic of language.
What becomes of "things - metaphysical"? Do they contain any element of reality at all #a metaphysic of mysticism or 'Inexpressible', - a metaphysic of transcendence is nontheoretical aspiration
The metaphysical problems are all 'pseudo' problems deserving no solution at all. They are to be 'dissolved1 rather than solved
. If philosophy is but a critique of language and the natural sciences exhaust the whole of all that is 'sayable' or 'describable', even of ordinary discourse, other than tautologies, there is left no space at all for 'metaphysics' as embodying any 'meaningful' (speculative) discourse or branch of knowledge
On this count, metaphysics has been shown to be 'impossible' and its statements being 'meaningless and pseudo' resulting from a violation of the logic of language.
What becomes of "things - metaphysical"? Do they contain any element of reality at all #a metaphysic of mysticism or 'Inexpressible', - a metaphysic of transcendence is nontheoretical aspiration
The metaphysical problems are all 'pseudo' problems deserving no solution at all. They are to be 'dissolved1 rather than solved
. If philosophy is but a critique of language and the natural sciences exhaust the whole of all that is 'sayable' or 'describable', even of ordinary discourse, other than tautologies, there is left no space at all for 'metaphysics' as embodying any 'meaningful' (speculative) discourse or branch of knowledge
No comments:
Post a Comment