The New York Times and its crusade against Donald Trump

To read the New York Times is to reminded of

Izvestia or Pravda, those Russian newspapers

where dissent meant a decade in the Gulag.  The New York Times is viewed as a democratic organ

 a bastion of  free speech; yet in its dealing of Trump there is wall to wall mocking, sneering, and rather infantile giggling; yet  the quality of journalism by their soi disant (so called) educated journalists is decidely average

I mean if you are looking for Journalistic depth cast your eyes elsewhere.

Scan one of their articles ridiculing Trump and you will see on average 300 to 400  hundred comments from the readers and I defy you or anybody else to find  a comment which is not Trump bashing.  It is frighteningly like some and mad herd snorting and blowing as they aimlessly thunder after their prey.

Have a read on the Internet and see for yourself, oh sorry, of those 400 comment there is one who challenges and criticises the article, me, your blogger, Peter Cheevers - but I have to rein in my criticisms for anything too crtiical of the NYT or its journalists is jut not printed.

Here is one they did not print on Sarah Hucakbee being irritating.

New York Times wrote on 28/02/18
'She even came in behind Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a person whose only actual power is to be irritating.'

My response is below:

To quote George Orwell '...you have to be really of the educated classes to make such a claim.' For this is a

particularly un chivalorous remark and even anti women perchance? You see we can all play the victim card.

An observation from this side of a less biased ocean for 'Une femme d'un certain age' to withstand a veritable lions den of hostility on a daily basis is a remarkable feat of equanimity.

So why do I see it that way and you see conversely? I mean, who is wearing the blinkers; why is your utopia my dystopia? Is it culture, education?

Or is it simply the Liberal voice wailing like some lone wolf in a wilderness without power.