Journalists and their pose of objectivity

Theres is a pose of objectivity into which journalists habitually, almost mechanically, fall into when they write. The ‘I’ of journalism is a kind of ultra-reliable narrator and impossibly rational and disinterested person, whose relationship to the subject more often than not resembles the relationship of a judge pronouncing sentence on a guilty defendant. 

In their  overarching yearning for certainty, journalists merely replicate the intolerance and taste for indoctrination that the profess to despise in that other religion,  Trump/deplorables et al.   Instead of the relentless anti-Trump and their efforts to appear sapient (wise)
why not leave things out (Trump hatred) this when enacted can be done to great effect.

Whereas the ‘I’ of journalism is unsuited to autobiography. Autobiography is an exercise in self-forgiveness. The observing ‘I’ of autobiography tells the story of the observed ‘I’ not as a journalist tells the story of his subject, but as a mother might. The older narrator looks back at his younger self with tenderness and pity, empathising with its sorrows and allowing for its sins.