There
are well known philosophical puzzles about normativity, and these apply to
logic as well if it is normative.
One is why it is that thinkers are under such rubric like norms.
After all, why shouldn't I think the way I prefer to think, without
there being some norm that governs my thinking, whether I like it or not?
Why
is there an “ought” that comes with thinking as such, even if I don't want to
think that way
The idea that belief as such aims at something: the truth. If so then maybe one
could argue that by having beliefs I am under the norm that I ought to have
true ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment