Contact Form * Contact Form Container */ .contact-form-widget { width: 500px; max-width: 100%; marg


Email *

Message *

He is a grifter a gaslighting zonbie who copulates with podiums

These are words written by a supposed educated journalist in a 'respected' journal.

Trump appeared to copulate with his podium in the debates with Hillary Clinton

watching Trump lurching behind Hillary during the debate felt a bit like a zombie movie
. Earlier in the campaign he’d urged his supporters to shoot her. ‘Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment,’ he rumbled at one of his 
tie led chants of ‘Lock her up!’ In the spring, 

Trump retweeted a supporter who asked: ‘If Hillary Clinton can’t satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?

Yes, Trump  is a 'grifter'  (someone who swindles you through deception or fraud) but surely this charge can be laid at the Clinton's door ie Clinton Foundation.
..Trump is also a .Gaslighter (a form of manipulation through persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying in an attempt to destabilize and delegitimize a target) Ah dear how one word can be a catch all for one's bias.
With Trump's election  America is about to become a battered woman, badgered, lied to, threatened, gaslighted, betrayed and robbed by a grifter with attention-deficit disorder. (How charming how kind)

Trump is patriarchy unbuttoned, paunchy, in a baggy suit, with his hair oozing and his lips flapping and his face squinching into clownish expressions of mockery and rage and self-congratulation.
More charm trowelled on the discerning writer. 

The narratives against Hillary cast her as a witch with  unlimited powers, or as a wicked woman, because she had had power and aspired to have power again. One got the impression that any power a woman had was too much, and that a lot of men found women very scary. But what of Merkel and Thatcher et al
'white men elected them.

Here is another lefty balanced writer:
One of the many lessons of the recent presidential election campaign and its repugnant outcome,’ Mark Lilla wrote in the New York Times

and so it goes on and on and you come to you hope is a balanced view that these supposedly educated journalists are infused with a kind of religious zeal and if their commandments are contravened bigotry homophobia Islamophobia diversity  racism they must speak up to defend their Liberal faith and it is under that injunction you can say, goodbye balance and hello bias.

The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but, on the contrary, that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledgehammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one’s will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp.
That emotion was directed at Clinton, and was ready to swerve towards anyone who supported her, accompanied by accusations of treason and other kinds of invective

No comments: