Deconstruction is parasitic,it says nothing, I didn't know that.

Derrida, like many other contemporary European theorists, is preoccupied with undermining the oppositional tendencies that have befallen much of the Western philosophical tradition.

In fact, dualisms are the staple diet of deconstruction, for without these hierarchies and orders of subordination it would be left with nowhere to intervene. 

Deconstruction is parasitic in that rather than espousing yet another grand narrative, or theory about the nature of the world in which we partake, it restricts itself to distorting already existing narratives, and to revealing the dualistic hierarchies they conceal. While Derrida’s claims to being someone who speaks solely in the margins of philosophy can be contested, it is important to take these claims into account. 

Deconstruction is, somewhat infamously, the philosophy that says nothing

yet all of the elements of a deconstructive intervention reside in the “neglected cornerstones” of an already existing system, and that is why as a theory 

Deconstruction is so beguiling