One can read claims to 'morality' at different levels: the overt, the allegorical, and the eschatological (referring to the end of the world), and the 'moral' itself, however all such notions are metaphorical evasions .
The intentions of politicians Pelosi. Booker Harris OAC was to open and claim meaning through the depth-metaphor of morality. Their expositions and claims to the 'good, the truth' are sounded off as if with apostolic authority
as if they were the center of the
universe containing and exceeding all time
with their deep knowledge and asserted as if what they were claiming was the
literal, the reduced, the defined, instead of what they are, simplistic opinions.
How can one say that we are moving closer to the (moral) truth without
knowing what the truth is? One can argue that a moral is one that is “corroborated”
rather than “verified,”
How can one say that we are moving closer to the truth without
knowing what the truth is?
“truth” has assumed that truth is
the right term for the actual state of affairs. We were cautioned by Heisenberg
that the observer and the observed are not to be conceived as “subject and
object,” that there is a more unified way of conceiving of physical reality.
Truth is relational,
Truth is relational,
No comments:
Post a Comment