Pelosi appears to be a fairly simple politician so why she has not been exposed to a robust intellectual argument is beyond me.. But let us attempt to get into her mind set. She must have thought, 'right... how to be denunciatory, (of course she would not use such a big word) so she claims 'the WALL is immoral and so let's’s, you know, aesthetize
the immaterial (a wall).
So the wall is disembodied, she as a mediator to
this inanimate object thinks of a way to telescope, unfold, embed something
into bricks and mortar so she falls back on the metaphysical, or quasi
Religious notion of MORALITY.
So re-embodiment (of that inanimate object the Wall) will be
employed as a task of transformation. What is now tacitly suggested to any voter who cares to listen
Is that one visualizes, (morality) with all its religious
connotations and encryption's; to make the symbolic (morality) stick in the
mind.
So that the symbolic notion of
morality morphs into a material object in the mind., so now it is and not just symbolic but material
However, let us return to the ‘real’world; Morality is not
empirically quantifiable, does not inheres in us as does the sting in the Bee and is not as observable as say that of child care, fencing,
gardening, or baking. This is why those Democratic stalwarts. Kalima Harris,
COA, Pelosi, Warren, and their army of progressive followers, point their
fingers (a dietic gesture) at something that is
not there but might be there with the proviso that is you vote them
POWER - the drug of choice that all politician's opt for.
No comments:
Post a Comment