Social warriors may be sincere but that does not mean they are correct in their beliefs

Is it  right to be wary of those who bring to political activism an egoistical yearning for personal transcendence, unaware as they are of their quasi religious leanings.

When one watch these social warriors in action it is hard to distinguish the charlatan, the poser and the ego-tripper from the genuine idealist who wants to do good and whose passion may be sincere.  However what is 'good' for the social warrior is not good for everybody and although his/her passion may be sincere

that does not mean it is correct.