Atoms - You are me and I am You and we are Together

allest clue to how conscious mind could come to be.

So we  have this complex array of things out there, houses, gardens, squirrels "

We use metaphor in a utilitarian (useful) way to describe our daily doings 'I am in the garden' well, one is not 'in' anywhere

for the garden is in the area and the area is in and we could go on ad infinitum (for ever),

So how do we describe our perception well we have to think atomistically, (at the smallest scale of atoms). So take our consciousness, our 'minds' but these minds have to come from somewhere. So they come from the unconscious.

Now modern physics forces us towards the atomistic position,  and this defensible point of view the unconscious is -it is composed of material (atoms).

Now atoms in their singularity do not exhibit quotients (make up) of left handedness or right handedness,

The isolated atom has no structure to make the mirror image different from the thing itself and it is ­only when they arrange themselves along helices that they take on the appearance of a left-handed or a right-handed. This quality of ‘handedness’ is in no sense embryonically present in the atoms – it comes into being in the process of chemical combination.   And this has very valid consequences if we think of us having free will.

Can we choose our parents? Eh no.

Coming back to the atoms and this is rather beautiful once atoms are enjoined, they will always be enjoined no matter how  far apart they are

 

John Lennon got it on the dot "You are me and I am you and we are all together,"

 

 

 

 

as Medawar has stressed, research is the art of the soluble – and leave others to build on it or clear up the mess

scheme of physical science.

 

that a certain level of organisation is required before the first flicker of consciousness appears on the scene

A piece of iron can be magnetised at ordinary temperatures but loses this quality on heating to a dull red heat. In its high-temperature form the property of magnetisability is completely absent, not just too weak to be observed: but as it is cooled there is a well-defined critical temperature at which magnetisability appears, very weakly at first but becoming rapidly stronger with further cooling. We must distinguish between quantity and quality. As the iron is cooled the quantity of magnetisation can take any value in a continuous range: qualitatively the iron is either not magnetisable or magnetisable (however feebly). There is no question of the degree of magnetisability slowly becoming appreciably large as we approach the critical point from above: the way it suddenly begins to shoot up a

science I have none about this approach to matters of feeling and religion, which is ‘the vision of