The idea that literature, or any other discipline like boxing or song-writing, could modify psychoanalytic theory – that it could be a two-way street –
has always been problematic for psychoanalysts. There is, of
course, no reason to think a psychoanalyst’s interpretation of a
boxing match would necessarily be more revealing than
a boxer’s account of a psychoanalytic session.
But psychoanalysts have worked on the rather misleading
principle that psychoanalysis is only useful or interesting if it is in
some sense right, rather than believing that it is another good way
of
speaking about certain things like love and loss and memory, as
songs can be (and that, also like songs, it is only ever as good
as it sounds). For most psychoanalysts, including Freud, Great
Artists tend to provide either vivid illustration or prestigious
confirmation of psychoanalytic insights. Melanie Klein,
for example, found nothing she didn’t already know in the
Oresteia, and even Lacan found Hamlet reassuring
You Tube: On Being in Two Places at One Time.
Bosco Redmond·4 videos
No comments:
Post a Comment